An interview by Indian Ambassador to the US Ronen Sen to rediff.com Managing Editor Aziz Haniffa in Washington on the Indo-US nuclear deal created an uproar in Parliament and led to disruptions in both Houses on Tuesday.
The following is the log of proceedings in the Lok Sabha.
The Lok Sabha began on Tuesday with interruptions.
Communist Party of India-Marxist leader Basubeb Acharya of Left party told Speaker Somnath Chatterjee: "Sir, today it has appeared (interruptions)"
Speaker: "It has become very difficult to run this House. Please listen. I have got one notice for suspension of the Question Hour from Professor Vijay Kumar Malhotra."
Interruptions
Speaker continues, "I take it that the matter is the alleged statement or remarks made by our Ambassador in the USA."
Again interruptions.
Another member from Left Rupchand Pal said, "Sir, I have also given a notice on this."
Speaker told him: "You are so much upset that you did not give notice in time."
House remained interrupted.
Speaker then told the House: "Please listen. We have got information from the government. A statement, which the honourable minister of external affairs wishes to make, is before me. In the statement, there has been a denial of this report. Since, all of you are agitated on the same issue, let the honourable minister of external affairs make his statement."
Interruptions continue.
Bharatiya Janata Party leader Vijay Kumar Malhotra: "Sir, please allow me to speak now."
Again one could not hear anything.
The statement regarding clarification on the purported statement by Indian Ambassador in Washington on the civil nuclear energy co-operation agreement was placed in House.
Speaker: "Let the honourable minister make his statement. After all, we cannot act only on the newspaper report."
Again the house was non-functional due to interruptions.
Speaker tells staff reporters: "Do not record even one word."
(Interruptions, not recorded)
Speaker is upset about the indiscipline.
He tells members of the BJP and Left parties, "After his statement, if you have anything to say, you can say. On the basis of an imaginary alleged statement, you cannot go on holding the House to ransom."
Minister of External Affairs Pranab Mukherjee: "Sir, after listening to my statement, they can speak."
But, again are interruptions.
Speaker agreed and said: "After hearing the minister's statement, you can speak."
But members of the House are agitated over an interview by Ronen Sen to rediff.com.
Speaker again: "What are you doing? You have become most indisciplined now-a-days. After listening to the minister's statement, if you have anything to say, you can say, and I will permit you to say that."
After a few minutes, Mukherjee says: "Mr Speaker, sir, members would have seen reports in the press today about a purported statement by our ambassador in Washington about the consideration of the India-US bilateral civil nuclear energy cooperation agreement. I have contacted our ambassador who has informed me that certain comments, either deliberately or through misunderstanding, were published by the correspondent. The correspondent has also misquoted our ambassador in several respects. I have asked our ambassador to issue a clarification. These comments, if made by our ambassador, and reported correctly, are totally unwarranted and unacceptable. In democracy, there will always be dissension and divergence of opinions. Nobody can accuse others who hold divergent views. I regret the alleged comments which have hurt the feelings of the honourable members. Most respectfully I would like to submit this."
BJP and Left parties leaders were not satisfied.
Speaker invited Leader of the Opposition L K Advani. But, he could be hardly heard.
CPI's Gurudas Dasgupta demanded that, "Sir, the ambassador should be removed."
Again, proceedings get stalled.
Speaker: "You are behaving like irresponsible people. I am sorry to say that. The minister has placed entirely the government's stand on this. He has already said that it is unwarranted if it has been said. He has denied it in the statement. You wait for this. Can you behave like this in anticipation?"
Telegu Desam Party's Khrinjarapu Yerrannaidu: "Sir, it is very shameful."
Speaker: "If he (Ambassador Sen) has said that, I shall take action. Parliament is not so powerless. Please sit down. Only one newspaper, not even a news agency, has reported."
Advani: "Mr Speaker, Sir, so far as the government's stand is concerned, I have no complaint. But I would like this House to know and to have the full text of the interview that has been given to this particular channel, namely, Rediffnews, (rediff.com) because simply denying and saying: 'It is not exactly what I have said' would not be enough. Many people may have been shocked to hear that MPs, who have been opposing this deal, have been described as 'headless chickens' (Interruptions)
Speaker requests Advani to wait. He said: "Honourable Leader of the Opposition, let us wait for the text."
Advani agreed.
Speaker to Advani: "I would allow you at that time. Let it be confirmed."
Advani: "I would urge the leader of the House that let the House be given the full text of the interview that the ambassador has given. After that, we will make a considered comment on it; and then demand whatever action we think appropriate."
Speaker: "That is fair enough. Let the statement come."
(Interruptions)
At this point of time Left leader Mohmmad Salim said, "Sir, this interview was carried on the website www.rediff.com. So, it is not the question of 'let the copy come.' It is already circulated in the world! The comments are made. This is a systematic design, I am telling you, sir... (Interruptions)
Speaker: "You are speaking without my permission. No, I will not allow this anymore. We cannot react on the basis of newspaper report unless it is authenticated. No sorry."
Speaker kept saying: "No, I cannot allow this."
Then when the interruptions continued, he said: 'Honourable members, please cooperate. It has already been said by the honourable minister of external affairs that 'these comments, if made by our ambassador, and reported correctly, are totally unwarranted and unacceptable.' And, I have given you my word that I shall take action against it. What more can be done now?"
(Interruptions)
Speaker: "Do not record even one word. Let the country see what is happening in the House. I have assured you that I would take action; the Parliament of India is not that powerless at all. Nobody can go scot-free. Already the minister has condemned it, if it is found to have been said. We never take action on a newspaper report unless it is authenticated. (interruptions) No, I will not allow this. I cannot devalue this House."
EhE
When BJP leaders continued their opposition to Sen's remarks the Speaker said: "Your leader has spoken. I appreciate the stand taken by the honourable leader of the opposition. He has rightly asked for a full copy of the statement, and after that, he said, he reserves his right. I have considered that. I will give opportunity to everybody after the statement comes, and you see that."
(more interruptions)
Speaker: "No, I am sorry. It seems that you are not willing to work. The House stands adjourned till 11.30 am"
The Lok Sabha then adjourned for 30 minutes. Lok Sabha again assembled at 11.30.
It began with more interruptions.
Speaker: "You are not prepared to allow the House to run. Are you prepared to allow the House to run or not?"
Interruptions and more interruptions. The House adjourned till 2 pm
When again it assembled Deputy Speaker C J Chatwal was in the chair.
Basubeb Acharya: "We have submitted a privilege motion against India's Ambassador to the United States Shri Ronen Sen for making derogatory remarks against Members of Parliament."
House again sees chaos.
Gurudas Dasgupta: "Sir, I have also given a notice of privilege against the India's Ambassador to the United States."
CPI-M's Varkala Radhakrishnan: 'I have also given a privilege notice. Prima facie, he has committed a breach of privilege, and a notice has been given by me (interruptions)
Speaker: "Please sit down. Your notice is under consideration.
By this time a statement is made regarding communication received from Indian Ambassador in Washington regarding his comments on the Civil Nuclear Energy cooperation agreement.
Pranab Mukherjee addresses the Deputy Speaker: "Mr Deputy-Speaker, sir, most respectfully I would like to submit that in the morning I shared the information with the honourable members, and I am grateful to them that they allowed me to make my observations. Of course, the honourable members have their own view as this is a matter on which every individual member has his views, and they can express it. Every honourable member is entitled to resort to even the parliamentary course of redressal like privilege or other things whatever they like to do. I am not going to interfere with that. Most respectfully I am sharing with the House whatever information that I am having with me. I have received another communication from Ambassador Sen. With your permission, I would like to share that information with the honourable members. This is the observation, which Ambassador Sen has sent to me. It reads as follows: 'I have received several queries about a report datelined Washington DC, August 20, 2007 by Aziz Haniffa of Rediff India Abroad, which quoted me extensively on the India-US Civil Nuclear Agreement.
'I had an off-the-record conversation with the correspondent giving some assessments on this subject. A number of the comments were, however, either misunderstood or misquoted or quoted out of context. For instance, I did not say that the Hyde Act could not be renegotiated, but said that the bilateral agreement could not, in my view, be renegotiated. With reference to the Hyde Act, I had expressed my assessment it would not be amended in the foreseeable future. Some of the comments attributed to me in this off-the-record conversation were made by me in my personal capacity and do not reflect the positions of the government'."
House witnesses interruptions.There was shouts no, no. no!
Mukherjee: "Please let me complete. You do whatever you like, but let me complete. It will not take even one minute. Please listen to me. 'I fully recognise that such personal views, even in a private conversation, should have been expressed with better judgment and due decorum. For instance, my comment about 'running around like a headless chicken looking for a comment here or a comment there' was a tactless observation on some of my media friends and most certainly not with reference to any honourable Member of Parliament. It was certainly not my intention to cast aspersions on any individual or organisation. However, if I have unwittingly hurt any sentiments, I offer my unqualified apologies'. Thank you."
There was so much noise that Deputy Speaker said that nothing will go on record.
And, after waiting for few minutes he adjourned House to meet on August, 22.
Also see:
