![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
HOME | MOVIES | REVIEWS |
May 12, 2000
5 QUESTIONS
|
![]() An absolute fiasco!Sukanya Verma
There is nothing wrong about remaking a film, but why kill it altogether? This may sound harsh, but, frankly, after seeing Jung, one doesn't know what else to say. The original was no great shakes in the first place, so to expect anything earthshattering from a remake would be foolish.
But happiness is such a furtive thing, isn't it? Especially in Bollywood. Poor beta Saahil is suffering from blood cancer and can survive only if he gets a bone marrow transplant. The only match found is a serial, psychotic killer, Balli (Sanjay Dutt), whom Veer had arrested four years ago.
What happens next? See for yourself and decide. Actually, don't bother! Jung could have been an interesting thriller, had the film-maker underplayed the blood, gore and violence and concentrated more on the screenplay and storyline.The film has too many technical flaws and the editing is patchy and sloppy.
Dutt has being playing the antihero in so many films since Khalnayak that he sleepwalks through this one. Though someone with good diction has dubbed for him, the voice sounds nothing like his. Jackie Shroff wears the same confused expression through the film. Raveena Tandon underplays her role and gives a decent performance. Shilpa Shetty's role in the film is hardly worth a mention yet, as Dutt's hot girlfriend, she manages to deliver the goods.
Interestingly, Gupta isn't mentioned in the credits. Dutt, who supported the director, also washed his hands off the film and refused to dub. Wise decision, we would say!
|
Do tell us what you think of this review
|
|
HOME |
NEWS |
BUSINESS |
MONEY |
SPORTS |
MOVIES |
CHAT |
INFOTECH |
TRAVEL SINGLES | NEWSLINKS | BOOK SHOP | MUSIC SHOP | GIFT SHOP | HOTEL BOOKINGS AIR/RAIL | WEATHER | MILLENNIUM | BROADBAND | E-CARDS | EDUCATION HOMEPAGES | FREE EMAIL | CONTESTS | FEEDBACK |