Questions that Prof Sumit Ganguly did not answer
King (Fri Jun 12 1998 1:54 IST)
Hi everyone:-)
Sh (Fri Jun 12 1998 1:55 IST)
Hi:-)
Sh (Fri Jun 12 1998 1:56 IST)
Hi:-)
Shahezadi (Fri Jun 12 1998 1:57 IST)
Hi guys, hows trix?
King (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:33 IST)
hey guys
Vicky (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:37 IST)
Hello everybody
Jason (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:37 IST)
Hi Vicky
Vicky (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:38 IST)
Hi Jason
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:44 IST)
Hello people ... So ... do we ask about the bomb ... again?!
chirayu (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:46 IST)
hello
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:47 IST)
Prof Ganguly: IN your perception ... why is it that India is not being taken seriously in the West when she accuses China as being the main reason for the recent Nuclear tests?
Jason (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:49 IST)
Hi Sai
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:49 IST)
Prof Ganguly : What does the Indian External Affairs ministry have to do to sell the Indian reasoning behind the Nuclear tests?
lnarayanan (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:50 IST)
Suparn/Ganguly what areas are covered in your chat. About bombs or anything about India.
War Peace (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:51 IST)
Prof Ganguly, are you in? Got many questions to ask :-)
lnarayanan (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:51 IST)
Ganguly, Why is India always compared with PAK when India is to be compared with real big countries say US or China for that matter
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:51 IST)
LN: He is the South Asia expert ...
chirayu (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:52 IST)
The West is seeing the religious and political tensions brewing between India and Pakistan in Kashmir and with this in mind, I think they attributed the bomb to being a threat to Pakistan.
lnarayanan (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:53 IST)
DO u feel in South Asia tensions have increased after bombing. I feel all it is Western media hype afterall for just six bombs by a SuperPower(INDIA)
Noah (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:53 IST)
Is the prof. here yet?
chirayu (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:54 IST)
I must admit that I am slightly biased because the information I receive concerning this matter is through the Western media hype.
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:54 IST)
Noah : He is probably reading the questions as we speak.
chirayu (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:54 IST)
Yes, a lot of it is the Western media hype, but yet, the testing of nuclear bombs is nothing to ignore when it comes to international peace.
lnarayanan (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:54 IST)
Ganguly, Will the next meeting between Atalji and Sharif bring any results bcos both have brought in no more tests
Noah (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:55 IST)
I can't understand why the other countries just mind their own business. Highly hypocritical I say. First build your own N weapons then ban the others from conducting their tests.
Noah (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:55 IST)
I can't understand why the other countries just mind their own business. Highly hypocritical I say. First build your own N weapons then ban the others from conducting their tests.
chirayu (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:56 IST)
Noah, I must agree with you there since America looked down upon nuclear testing right after they got the ability to test them through the use of computers.
lnarayanan (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:56 IST)
DO u agree with Nani Palkivala's suggestion Kashmir be given to PAK to bring an end to the issue
chirayu (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:57 IST)
NO! You let in and they will keep asking for more...
u maze me (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:57 IST)
prof. don't u think that india's only fault in the nuclear testing is that it has come too late, perhaps 20 years late? Had we followed pokhran, the new security council seat would have been securely ours....
lnarayanan (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:57 IST)
IF kashmir is given to PAK as suggested by him, will it not be harmful to India since New Delhi is closer to Kashmir
Noah (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:57 IST)
Prof. I would just like to ask why we have to make so much noise about carrying out a N-test.
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:58 IST)
Prof ganguly : Welcome!
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:58 IST)
Prof Ganguly: IN your perception ... why is it that India is not being taken seriously in the West when she accuses China as being the main reason for the recent Nuclear tests?
chirayu (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:58 IST)
If there was a certain peace between India and Pakistan after that, then it may be an alternative to consider, but I don't think it will completely solve the problem
lnarayanan (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:59 IST)
Ganguly, What will be the effect of sanctions. Even that is media hype. That is not going to be big problem going by the statistics that it is only 2%
Noah (Fri Jun 12 1998 7:59 IST)
Do you really think there will be peace between India and Pak
chirayu (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:1 IST)
India and Pak with peace would be ideal and all I'm saying is that we should strive to achieve our goal with compromise. (I know it is a broad statement)
lnarayanan (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:1 IST)
What is the work of this SAARC when the West do not take it seriously and none of the border problems are solved till now with any neighbours incldiung Lanka
chirayu (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:1 IST)
I have to leave but it's been nice talking...bye
shiva (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:2 IST)
Hi everyone! how's it going?
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:5 IST)
People ... since the Prof is in NYC, it is likely that he has to think of the answers AND type them out himself! This may mean it will take more time for him to answer questions ... have patience!
Dharmatma (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:7 IST)
India is not taken seriously because 1) economically and militarily it is not strong 2) Indian leaders do not know how to play international relations game in international diplomatic language and public relations propaganda.
shiva (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:9 IST)
Am I wrong in assuming that the Kashmir is not the cause but only the sympton of all that is wrong between India and Pakistan. Even if India gives Kashmir to Pakistan, there will be another issue for dispute, it may never end...
Sammy (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:13 IST)
Professor are you optimisitic about india's future?
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:14 IST)
How can Kashmir be left to Pak, after all it is very close to New Delhi and problems will increase rather than decrese
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:15 IST)
Prof Ganguly: You sound quite pessimistic about the prospects for India. In a worst case scenario, (sanctions create economic problems, NRIs do not follow thru on funds, FDI is -ve, Pakistan and China cause more problems in the frontiers AND internally) do you think it is possible that India will be Balkanized? With all the festering problems, a weak government at the centre for the third time in a row, and strong regional satraps, isn't it possible that the forces straining India might force her to break up?
Dharmatma (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:15 IST)
Prof SG Idont think it is possible to come to terms and aggrements of any sort with Pakistan until it is defanged of its anti India and theocracy based fundamentalistic religious venom. Pakistan should be opened tothe rest of the world and made pluralistic society and equality in every respect to all the citizens living in that country.
Nandan (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:15 IST)
Hello everybody, from NewJersey. Actualy I came to Rediff chat for Mr Advaniji. Anybody know about that
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:16 IST)
In my opinion India will never break up because although people vote for regional parties, they will never lose their identity as Indians. India is not USSR
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:17 IST)
Nandan, It is not Advaniji's chat it is about Ayodhya
daram (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:18 IST)
Shiva: You are correct. Pakistan will come for some thing else. It may Tamil Nadu Muslim, Bombay Muslim to start terror. Pak may say it has moral legal obligation as it says now for Kasmir. Never ending game - until victory - old wish
Nandan (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:19 IST)
Lnara, About Ayodhya, right. But we will be hearing from Advaniji right.If so when is it going to star etc? Any one from Rediff?
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:19 IST)
Prof, I do not think Advaniji's statement are intemperate bcos there can be no one to challenge his knowledge that too about Indo-Pak he being a sindhi. He is not such kind of a person to give lose statements without understandingthe reality
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:20 IST)
nandan,it is not Advanji's chat.i think it is Sai's ji's picture for publicity
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:20 IST)
Prof Ganguly: IN your perception ... why is it that India is not being taken seriously in the West when she accuses China as being the main reason for the recent Nuclear tests? What does the Indian External Affairs ministry have to do to sell the Indian reasoning behind the Nuclear tests?
shiva (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:22 IST)
Right on daram :-) the problem is not and never really was kashmir, it is just the whole issue of indo-pak rivalry.
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:23 IST)
Prof, India's thrust lies in agriculture and the power subsidies are being cut, what more can be done overnight bjp coming to power for the first time with useless allies
Nandan (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:23 IST)
Lnara, I liked your comment about Advaniji, and Sai srinivas, who are we chatting with, in case of Ayodhya later in the day I suppose?
shiva (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:24 IST)
Thanks for the reply, prof. Indian diplomacy is the pits was made clear by the way Naresh Chandra handled the post-Pokhran issue (flat footed and ham handed). What needs to be done?
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:24 IST)
Nandan, Afterall we are Indians. how can we support Congress being a patriot
Satbir (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:25 IST)
Hi everybody, Isn't it a shame that politicians both in India and Pakistan have made such a mess of the whole relationship exercise while at the ground level - a man walking down the street wheteher in India or Pakistan - the relationship is quite cordial and friendly.
Sammy (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:25 IST)
well the fact is that pakistan was built on the twin nation theory and they will always perceive India as being anti Muslim because otherwise their basic twin nation theory is challenged
Nandan (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:25 IST)
Right on the mark, bud.
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:25 IST)
Prof. Ganguly: Is it possible, from a cynical point of view, that the war of words in progress between Pakistan and India is inspired by "1984"? I mean, are all of these comments solely for internal consumption so that the respective governments can remain stable? What could happen if a more stable BJP were to come into power in New Delhi (a plausible scenario ... JJ withdraws support, loss of majority .. calls for a flash election)?
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:26 IST)
Prof, Assuming India giving concessions to PAK will they come to the table given their fanaticism and military rule
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:28 IST)
Prof, Is 1971 war a necesity for India if you say that is the Pak's main hatred against India. do not you think it is better if east and west Pak were fighting it is better for India
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:28 IST)
Prof ganguly : The surcharge was reduced today to 4%
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:29 IST)
Prof, What about latest demand by JJ regarding Sri Lankan problem. Will Atalji mess up? no i guess
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:31 IST)
What about 1971 war. Has it done good for India. except Mrs Gandhi coming back to power and destroying the country further
daram (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:31 IST)
Dharmatma: You are correct. Pakis will be never satisfied- They are full of hatred and conquest minded
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:33 IST)
If our next foreign minister is excellent, then why worry about international diplomacy after all he knows both finance and defence, he being both ex-FM and Army man
Sammy (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:34 IST)
I agree that there has been a slowdown in economy but India has various inherent strengths -trained manpower, independant judiciary, a sound financial system, a large consumer market which should attract the investor and we have liberalized a lot. So are these 'disappointments' with the economy cause for serious alarm? Till when do you expect India to become a reasonably large economy ?
ace (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:37 IST)
Lnara, indigenously... that means that we get nowhere ... fast.. there is so much more we can borrow from Israel.. russia...
Sammy (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:37 IST)
I don't agree withu Lnara, No country can live in isolation
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:38 IST)
Prof, When do you predict a war between India and China given India's nuclear power There is no point fighting with Pak, instead destroy China and PAK will come along automatically. But India will never go for a war because India is a peace loving country
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:40 IST)
Do you think India siding with USSR for a long time created hatred among US against India. IF so India-USSR alliance is right or wrong
ace (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:41 IST)
Lnara .. we made our bed.. now we must lie in it with.. a weak.. poor russia...
asanta (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:41 IST)
I think the problems between India and Pakistan are not only Kashmir. Even if the Kashmir problems are solved they will then demand the Muslim majority areas in India as theirs. You cannot come to any longlasting peace with Pakistan. Secondly, until very recently the govenrnment in Pakistan was not democratic and they did not know how to honour the international treaties especially with India. They are highly provocative and always try to trap India to undeclared wars. Kashmir is and will remain as problems, until Paki's find another one. I wonder what is the better way out
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:42 IST)
Prof, India had problems bcos USSR split. Will India go that way if India didnt develop in another 10 yrs
Sammy (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:42 IST)
Lnara, i think war between India and China would be simply disastrous
ace (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:43 IST)
Lnara .. India splitting.. a good possibility given that the power rulers are hindus.. and all other religons are treated as second class people...
Lnara (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:44 IST)
Will India improve drastically in another 10 yrs given our software talent and thse kind of problems with neighbours.
Dharmatma (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:44 IST)
HI folks; People should have pride in themselves and in their country, optimism in future. Conviction of beliefs and willing to do whatever it takes to build a strong, prosperous and noble country. Because Congress wishy-washy leadership India did not realize this goal. It is hoped BJP will change all this. We must know that country's freedom does not come free. Everybody has to sacrifice something.
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:45 IST)
(repeat modified Q) Prof. Ganguly: Thank you for answering my Questions. Is it possible, from a cynical point of view, that the war of words in progress between Pakistan and India is inspired by "1984"? I mean, are all of these comments solely for internal consumption so that the respective governments can remain stable? What could happen if a more stable BJP were to come into power in New Delhi (a plausible scenario ... JJ withdraws support, loss of majority .. calls for a flash election)? And BJP comes to power in spectacular fashion with a 2/3 majority, riding the nuclear approval wave?
daram (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:46 IST)
Prof: You are correct- we cannot go back in history. But we need storng nuclear deterent India so that Pakistan should know clearly following. If India is nuked by first strike by China or Pakistan - then there will no Pakistan existance (not a one soul) of Pakistan to see a destroyed India
aman (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:54 IST)
hello professor Sumit Ganguly
lnaray (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:54 IST)
Do u think Pak made a mistake by going for tests . they would have got money from US for not doing so
Sammy (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:55 IST)
looking back sir, would it have been advisable for India to work with Israel and try to bomb Pakistan's nuclear weapon sites before it reached this state? Also India doesn't really have many allies shouldn't we really look at the possibility of defence cooperation with Israel?
aponi (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:56 IST)
India as an independent country has many failures and successes. The most important failures of course are poverty and lack of education. But its foreign policy is another problem needs urgent repair. Such a huge country with so much wealth and other developments but its importance in international arena is highly insignificant
daram (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:56 IST)
Astana: you are correct. Only one way to Pakistanis: Next time, peacefully all muslims to Pakistan which is according to them is muslim nation. No talking
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:56 IST)
A V ... Welcome!!
Sammy (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:57 IST)
Sir what can we do to address such failures of intelligence
Atlanta Vijay (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:57 IST)
Sai narasim : _/\_ again! :) and hi to all.
pc (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:58 IST)
sammy > why should israel co-operate with India?
lnaray (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:58 IST)
Prof, Whom do u think as India's best Foreign Minister. What about Karan singh
Sammy (Fri Jun 12 1998 8:59 IST)
well pc, Israel has some genuine fears about pakistan leaking nuclear technology to the arab world
pc (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:0 IST)
sammy > how does co-operting with india assuage those fears?
lnaray (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:1 IST)
Prof, I am LNARA again as lnaray. UF govt's initiative with Bangladesh is a miserable failure. What do u say about the NE problem of infiltartion. I think as long as Jyoti Basu is there there is any scope of improvement of our mineral rich lands in the east
Atlanta Vijay (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:2 IST)
Prof. Ganguly : Why is the USA so interested in furthering ties with China at the expense of India or Pakistan? What do you think is Clinton strategy as far as South Asia is concerned so that USA can get maximum benefit out of it economically/politically??
Gobinda (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:2 IST)
Sammy (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:2 IST)
well pc at one point of time there were a lot of rumours that Israel was considering bombing Pakistan's nuclear sites if India was willing to assist it
ace (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:3 IST)
Sammy ... if israel gets involved against pakistan.. then it is in serious trouble as this would further align the Arabs with Pakistan.... and provide all type of financial help.. is this what you want..
lnaray (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:3 IST)
Prof? The US lacks understanding of the problems in south east. We can see their only concern uptil now was Israel-Palestine. They never cared about Ind-Pak. No they are intersted bcos they are scared about India's power
lnaray (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:5 IST)
Prof, what did Gujral did to develop foreign affairs,he cancelled almost all his trips at the last minute and he is now shouting. why is this. what is UF contribution if any
lnaray (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:7 IST)
Prof, What about JJ's demand about the team to be sent to Lanka. Is it fair to meddle with their affairs
Atlanta Vijay (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:8 IST)
Prof. Ganguly : Discussing about the projection of security concerns to the other countries, Can't India do much better by keeping its defence plans secret and developing much more sophisticated conventional arms? The security concerns of nations like India/Pakistan have fallen on deaf ears most of the time. What big difference is it going to make if we tell them now? I saw in the CNN news that Clinton has said that China has a big part to play in the India-Pak affairs. Isn't direct interference into bilateral matters? Do you think that Chinese involvement as a third party to any talks going among India-Pak would help solve problems?
ace (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:11 IST)
shiva .. i think if they get the bomb.. they will blow up israel.. and then start shooting at each other...
lnaray (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:11 IST)
Prof, Will the entry of Pepsi and Coke into Indian markets right when their technologically wanted people are not coming as wiling as Pepsi or Coke. why do not we have a control for every entry of consumer area there should be investment in science areas
Dharmatma (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:11 IST)
Prof SG : Knowledge and psyche of the adversary and our past history should provide guidance and road map for our future actions. Pakistan is an extremely evil country with its leadership seeing nothing but religion (even other sects such as Ahmadias, Shias, Ismails , leave alone Sikhs, Hindus, Christians are eliminated) and narrow thinking. They think they are Arabs and does not want to do anything with Hindus and India.
Atlanta Vijay (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:11 IST)
Prof. Ganguly : Discussing about the projection of security concerns of india to the other countries, Can't India do much better by keeping its defence plans secret and developing much more sophisticated conventional arms? The security concerns of nations like India/Pakistan have fallen on deaf ears most of the time. What big difference is it going to make if we tell them now? I saw in the CNN news that Clinton has said that China has a big part to play in the India-Pak affairs. Isn't that direct interference into bilateral matters? Do you think that Chinese involvement as a third party to any talks going among India-Pak would help solve problems?
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:11 IST)
pc ... Good Q!!
lnaray (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:12 IST)
Prof, Who are our friends. Balasaheb Thackeray used to say our friend is Israel
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:13 IST)
A V ... Excellent Q!!
daram (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:13 IST)
Aman: Tell Canadian that Indians cannot go and take over some others country like Red Indians and Eskimos (Canadians did it). If all Canadians went back to England- Can they have that much food
lnaray (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:14 IST)
Prof, Will the NRIS invest more after the budget welcome and the Persons of origin card system
Neil (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:15 IST)
Hi there professor!
Atlanta Vijay (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:15 IST)
sai narasim : It seems like politics is definitely trying to play with the sentiments of both Indians and Pakistanis. This is very evident from hate messages on a lot of discussion boards throughout the net.
lnaray (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:16 IST)
Prof, Who is our enemy no 1. Is it China as said by George. PM disagrees with it.
Neil (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:16 IST)
Heeeeeeeello...Professor!!!
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:17 IST)
If you have CNN customnews ... here is a link http://customnews.cnn.com/cnews/pna.show_story?p_art_id=2649415&p_section_name=World&p_art_type=159544&p_subcat=Pakistan&p_category=Asia
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:19 IST)
A V: I dread the day when the Pakistani guys discover Rediff's site ... they may force it to shut down!
lnaray (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:19 IST)
Prof, Who is our friend in international arena. Definitely not US, China or Pak
Atlanta Vijay (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:20 IST)
Thanks Prof. Ganguly for answering our questions. All the Best to you.
pc (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:20 IST)
guys for information : A US official said the ministers agreed to a proposal by Secretary of State Madeleine Albright to use their votes in international financial institutions to delay consideration of all but the most essential loans. In a draft statement to be issued later, the G8 said: ``We do not want to punish the peoples of India and Pakistan and we will not oppose loans to meet basic human needs.''
lnaray (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:20 IST)
Thanks Prof
Atlanta Vijay (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:21 IST)
Sai narasim : *Laugh*... internet is a tough place to live in.... any troublemaker will have to take a break.... so things will come back to normal pretty soon and will remain that way for a long time! :)
Sammy (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:22 IST)
Thank you Prof, it was an interesting discussion.
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:22 IST)
PC: As an aside ... there was an article in the WSJ a couple of days ago that the American Farm lobby has successfully kept farm products outside the gamut of the sanctions that Clinton so eagerly imposed on India and Pakistan!
pc (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:22 IST)
this is largely symbolic i feel!
Atlanta Vijay (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:22 IST)
I personally DEPLORE the decision taken by these countries which are trying to cut off loans which can push our country forward economically (and of course get into big time debt like the US of A ) :)
umya (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:24 IST)
Mr. Ganguli what do you think about secretary of state's remarks about the hole?
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:25 IST)
Prof Ganguly : Thanks!!
Dharmatma (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:25 IST)
Aman : Congress was responsible for the sorry state of affairs in India. You can't separate security of the country from economic prosperity. Both are interlinked,particularly highly skilled and technolgy based present day defences. Security and prosperity must go on parallelly. All the countries who were weak in munitions and technology lost independence and were subjugated. In todays world it is essential to master technolgy. Do not depend on others.
pc (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:25 IST)
bye Dr. Ganguly, thanx
umya (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:25 IST)
Don't you think that we should strongly warn them about the language they are using?
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:25 IST)
umya, bharath: You're too late ... the good Prof just left.
ADOLF (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:25 IST)
WHAT DO U DAY ABOUT THE NUKE TESTS?
sainarasimhan (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:25 IST)
TATA folks ... It';s been nice!!
umya (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:26 IST)
I fully agreed with you Dharmatma.
umya (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:26 IST)
Oh man!
umya (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:26 IST)
Anyway going for lunch guys!
umya (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:27 IST)
Bye
Shree (Fri Jun 12 1998 9:29 IST)
Guys Mr Sumit Ganguly has logged off, but in 30 minutes at 2200 hours IST SAISURESH SIVASWAMY WILL BE LIVE AT THE QUORUM TO DISCUSS THE AYODHYA ISSUE!!!!! BE THERE
Michael (Fri Jun 12 1998 11:55 IST)
Whats happening next on this session?
Michael (Fri Jun 12 1998 11:56 IST)
Who else is there? Let's chat without the Prof!
| 
