|
|
Run-up to the Budget: Steel Industry
State of the industry (2000-01)
- Demand for steel is expected to increase marginally, due to low growth in construction and project related activities (such as the general engineering sector), marginal growth in agricultural output, and a decline in automobile production during the July-December 2000 period.
- The demand-supply situation is expected to be balanced, as producers maintained operating rates. No new investments were made for increasing capacity.
- In the international market, prices of flat products have declined significantly, due to an increase in inventories in the US and the EU, and a slow-down in the US economy. (Prices reached their peak levels in May-June 2000.) Domestic prices declined due to a decline in international prices. (Exports to the US were low due to the expected imposition of anti-dumping duties on Indian HR coil exports.)
- Prices of long products were also under pressure due to a marginal increase in domestic demand. Prices of steel intermediaries, such as sponge iron and pig iron, declined due to low demand for finished steel.
- During the April to September 2000 period, margins of domestic steel manufacturers remained low. Margins have been declining due to low realisations in the domestic and export markets, high interest rates, and depreciation.
Industry expectations from the Union Budget (2001-02)
- A reduction in the excise duty: The Cold Rolled Steel Manufacturers Association of India (CORSMA) has asked for a reduction in the excise duty on galvanised sheets, from 16 per cent to 8 per cent, in order to increase the demand for CR coils.
The All India Steel Rerollers Association has asked for the restoration of capacity based assessment (excise duty payable would be proportionate to the plant capacity), or alternatively a reduction in the ad-Valorem excise duty, from 16 per cent to 8 per cent.
- A reduction in the import duty: CORSMA has asked for a reduction in the import duty on HR coils, given the higher effective rate of protection provided to the industry by way of floor prices on HR coils. CORSMA has also asked for a reduction in import duty on zinc, from 35 per cent to 15 per cent, in order to reduce the cost of galvanising, and thereby increase the demand for CR coils.
The Pig Iron Manufacturers Association has asked for a reduction in the import duty on metallurgical coke, from 15 per cent to 5 per cent.
The Sponge Iron Manufacturers Association has asked for a reduction in the import duty on non-coking coal, from 15 per cent to 5 per cent.
The All India Steel Rerollers Association has asked for a reduction in the import duty on rerollable scrap, from 25 per cent to 5 per cent.
- Exemption of excise duty: The industry has asked for the exemption of excise duty on domestic steel used for power, petroleum and fertiliser projects, in order to compete with zero duty steel imports used for such projects.
Steel and intermediates: Duty structure
(per
cent) |
Customs
duty |
Excise
duty |
|
1999-2000 |
2000-01 |
1999-2000 |
2000-01 |
Coking
coal |
5.5 |
9.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Non-coking
coal |
16.5 |
21.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Refractories |
38.5 |
44.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
Inputs
for
refractories1 |
40.0 |
40.4 |
- |
- |
HBI/Sponge
iron |
27.5 |
32.6 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
Steel
melting
scrap |
5.5 |
9.7 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
Iron
ore,
pellets |
5.5 |
9.7 |
8.0 |
16.0 |
Ferro
molybdenum |
27.5 |
32.6 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
Ferro
nickel |
5.5 |
9.7 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
Other
ferro
alloys |
27.5 |
32.6 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
Pig
iron |
16.5 |
21.2 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
Billets/Slabs |
27.5 |
32.6 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
Bars
and
rods |
38.5 |
44.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
Structurals |
38.5 |
44.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
Plates |
38.5 |
44.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
HR
coils |
27.5 |
32.6 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
CR
coils |
38.5 |
44.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
GP/GC |
38.5 |
44.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
Electrical
steel
sheets |
38.5 |
44.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
TMBP |
27.5 |
32.6 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
Tin
plates |
38.5 |
44.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
Alloy
steels |
38.5 |
44.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
TMBP: Tin mill black plate
*Inputs for refractories include only dead burnt magnesite and fused magnesite.
Notes:
- 1) For 2000-01, customs duty includes the SACD of 4 per cent, effective since 1999-2000.
- In 1999-2000, the SACD was applicable only for non-traders, and hence, has not been included in the customs duty.
- 2) In the Union Budget 1999-2000, MODVAT credit was increased to 100 per cent of the excise duty paid on inputs.
- 3) Surcharge of 10 per cent on the basic customs duty, levied in the Union Budget 1999-2000, has been included in the customs duty for 1999-2000 and 2000-01.
Source: Central Excise and Customs Tariff
Steel and intermediates: Domestic and international prices, and landed cost
|
Domestic |
Prices |
International |
Prices |
Landed
Cost |
|
|
Rs/tonne |
|
$/tonne |
Rs/tonne |
|
Price
type |
Jan
2001 |
Price
type |
Jan
2001 |
Jan
2001 |
HBI/Sponge
iron |
Market |
6,000 |
- |
- |
- |
Scrap |
Market |
6,100 |
fob
US |
81 |
8,507 |
Pig
iron |
Market |
8,600 |
fob
CIS |
110 |
10,002 |
Billets |
Market |
n.a. |
fob
Europe |
180 |
16,050 |
Merchant
bars |
Market |
14,350 |
fob
London |
255 |
23,372 |
Wire
rods |
Market |
15,600 |
fob
Brussels |
310 |
19,807 |
Structurals |
Market1 |
15,600 |
fob
Europe1 |
298 |
26,779 |
HR
coils |
Market
10G
HR
Sheet |
17,500 |
fob
CIS |
170 |
15,321 |
CR
coils |
Market
16G
CR
Sheet |
21,500 |
fob
CIS |
267 |
24,330 |
GP/GC
sheets |
Market
20G
GP
Sheet |
22,800 |
fob
Brussels |
428 |
38,674 |
n.a.: Not available
- 1 Domestic prices are for Channels 300"90 mm and International prices are for sections 300-600 mm
Notes:
For 2000-01, the landed cost and customs duty include the SACD of 4 per cent, effective since 1999-2000. In 1999-2000, the SACD was applicable only for non-traders, and hence, has not been included in the customs duty.
Compiled by CRIS INFAC
Disclaimer: CRISIL has taken due care and caution in compiling this report. Information has been obtained by CRISIL from sources which it considers reliable. However, CRISIL does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. CRISIL is also not responsible for any errors in transmission and especially states that it has no financial liability whatsoever to the subscribers/ users/ transmitters/ distributors of its web site.
Rediff-CRISIL Budget Impact Analysis
Budget 2001
Tell us what you think of this report
|